·The European Commission intends to strengthen supervision of the automotive industry

The European Commission (hereinafter referred to as the European Commission) recently issued a proposal to correct the distribution of rights between European regulators and influential car companies. The German automotive industry is compliant. The plan calls for governments to strengthen supervision of the auto industry and impose large fines on violators, thereby strengthening the auto approval process.

Before US regulators revealed last year that Volkswagen installed cheats in 11 million cars, a roar in Berlin (the German capital) was enough to allow the EU to quickly withdraw those measures that could affect the German auto industry.
Two years ago, the European Union proposed to impose more stringent restrictions on car carbon dioxide emissions, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel successfully blocked the agreement at the last moment. A negotiator from the European Parliament said at the time: "I have seen this situation for the first time."

At that time, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council had already held a tripartite meeting to finalize the agreement. As long as the ambassadors of the countries formally passed, the agreement will come into effect. However, one night before the vote, Merkel was called to call Irish Prime Minister Nda Kenny (Ireland, the rotating European presidency) to request that the voting procedure for this agreement be removed from the agenda. Her request worked. The issue was postponed until the fall, and the strength of the rules was eventually weakened.

However, the public "diesel door" scandal highlights the inadequacy of the European car regulatory system, especially compared to the US regulatory system that exposed the scandal. Therefore, the power of power seems to return to the hands of the European Commission.

On this issue, an important cause of tension between governments and EU authorities is the size of the automotive industry. The German automotive industry contributes one-fifth of the industry's revenue to the country, creating 775,000 jobs. The automotive industry also dominates in countries such as France and Slovakia. This explains why some EU countries, led by Germany, worry that the European Commission's regulatory “enthusiasm” will dampen this sector.

In addition to having adapted to the "political nature" of the automotive industry, the European Commission said it would be careful not to "overdo it."

EU Internal Market and Industry Commissioner Iliz Betta Benkokovska said: "From the very beginning my position is very clear. I do not want the EU to establish a new institution."

It is expected that the European Commission’s proposal will lead to a contest between the European Council and the European Parliament. Governments that make up the Council of Europe are likely to resist this move that dilutes their rights, and most members of the European Parliament have long united to support this plan that will give the EU more power.

The European Commission’s Vice Chairman of Employment, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness, Yuki Katai, said at a press conference on Wednesday about the case of the public: “This (the above proposal) is not new, and we have been fighting for it before. But now the auto industry has to change with a serious attitude."

Although it is impossible to absolutely guarantee that no one will violate the new regulations, Katynin warned: "If someone can circumvent the request or cheat under the new proposal, then the person's psychology is definitely morbid."

On the one hand, the European Commission emphasizes the need to create a level playing field in a single European market, but on the other hand, Germany, France and Italy, the EU's largest automakers, fear that the regulations will have a huge impact on their economy and employment. .

New system

The above proposal is intended to implement three fundamental changes, and since the public admitted in September last year that the installation of cheats, the momentum of the proposal has continued to increase.

First, the proposal hopes to change the way new models are reviewed by cutting off the financial links between the car and the test lab. In addition, the operation of national review bodies will be supervised by similar institutions in other EU countries, thereby weakening the former.

Secondly, the proposal hopes that the state department and the European Commission will jointly conduct a spot check on the vehicles that have already been listed. If a non-compliant vehicle is found, then either party can conduct a recall. This is another case in which EU power expansion has eroded national sovereignty.

Third, the proposal allows the European Commission to impose financial fines on test centers and car companies. If there is a violation of the test center and the car company and the host government does not take action, the European Commission will have the right to impose a fine of up to 30,000 euros per vehicle (consistent with the US quota).

After the proposal was announced, the European Commission quickly assured the member states that its purpose was not to seize power. However, it is undeniable that if this proposal is passed, the European Commission will have greater power over the European multi-agency review system.

Katynin said that the proposal on Wednesday is only the first step. The European Commission plans to gradually introduce other proposals this year, including expanding the monitoring targets of new road test systems from nitrogen oxides to other air pollutants.

Biankovska said that before the public scandal was exposed, the European Commission had begun to change the system for regulating and monitoring the displacement of cars. The lesson given by the scandal is that "the European Commission must have regulatory powers, and we will establish a good and rigorous system to inspect vehicles."

The EU's current task is to convince governments of the need for new powers.

Member of the European Parliament, Daniel Dalton from the British Conservative Party said: "I am worried that the EU will refer to the US Environmental Protection Agency's approach and then say: "We have to establish such a system. "There is a mentality that if a system fails, the only solution is to centralize and intervene. They (EU officials) should not have such a mentality."

Water Treatment Chemical

Water Treatment Chemical,Custom Chemical,High Efficent Chemical,Useful Water Treatment Chemical

ZHEJIANG XINHAITIAN BIO-TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. , https://www.dadmacxht.com